{"id":19774,"date":"2013-06-12T09:19:17","date_gmt":"2013-06-12T13:19:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=19774"},"modified":"2013-06-12T09:19:41","modified_gmt":"2013-06-12T13:19:41","slug":"dix-lease-price-could-go-up-city-wants-to-know-by-how-much","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/city-council\/2013\/06\/12\/dix-lease-price-could-go-up-city-wants-to-know-by-how-much\/","title":{"rendered":"Dix Lease Price Could Go Up, City Wants to Know by How Much"},"content":{"rendered":"<style type=\"text\/css\"><!--\nP { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }A:link {  }\n--><\/style>\n<p>Raleigh officials need to know how much the Dorothea Dix property the state wants to keep, but state officials don\u2019t seem to be cooperating with the city.<\/p>\n<p>The cost of not knowing could be about $194,000.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this month Mayor Nancy McFarlane and Gov. Pat McCrory <a href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2013\/05\/28\/dix-debate-nears-compromise\/\">reached a compromise<\/a> and will create a new lease for the property between the city and the state.<\/p>\n<p>While that agreement is still making its way through the state legislature, Raleigh Council members need to pass a balanced budget by the end of the month.<\/p>\n<p>As part of the lease between the state and the city that was <a href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2012\/12\/04\/dix-to-become-raleigh-park\/\">signed in December<\/a>, the state will retain some of the Dix property, including some buildings and parking lots. That retained property is then deducted from the annual cost of the lease.<\/p>\n<p>A review of the retained property will be done each year.<\/p>\n<p>City Manager Russell Allen told the Record that originally, based on what the state wanted to retain, the city anticipated an annual lease payment of about $444,000.<\/p>\n<p>Preliminary discussions with the Department of Health and Human Services staff brought the annual payment down to $250,000 because staff members had identified more property they wanted to retain.<\/p>\n<p>Based on these discussions, the City Parks and Recreation Department only allocated $250,000 per year to the proposed budget, but an official calculation hasn\u2019t happened yet.<\/p>\n<p>The State\u2019s Department of Administration has refused to talk with the city to finalize a number for the new lease.<\/p>\n<p>According to a memo that was included in the City Council\u2019s budget packet, \u201cThe most recent correspondence from the State of North Carolina Department of Administration and the Parks and Recreation Department state that all further discussions about the calculation of the retail premises is \u2018premature\u2019 until the State General Assembly gives the DOA further direction.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The City\u2019s first rent check is due mid-July, but Allen said that staff is still unsure how much will be due.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s possible that it could be for the full $444,000. Allen said that the additional $194,000 would have to come from somewhere else in the budget.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With state officials unwilling to give the city any answers, it\u2019s possible that city leaders will have to find additional funding for the potential Dix property lease. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24029,"featured_media":16673,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,15],"tags":[693],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19774"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24029"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19774"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19774\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19774"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19774"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19774"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}