{"id":20888,"date":"2014-01-14T11:54:51","date_gmt":"2014-01-14T16:54:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=20888"},"modified":"2014-01-14T11:55:15","modified_gmt":"2014-01-14T16:55:15","slug":"council-committee-work-remains-from-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/city-council\/2014\/01\/14\/council-committee-work-remains-from-2013\/","title":{"rendered":"Council Committee Work Remains from 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Under former Mayor Charles Meeker, the various <a href=\"http:\/\/www.raleighnc.gov\/government\/content\/BoardsCommissions\/Articles\/CityCouncil.html\" target=\"_blank\">committees<\/a> in the Raleigh City Council would, at the end of an election year, clear out any old items to start a new year with a clear agenda.<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes that would involve a big push to get policy recommendations back to the full Council for a final vote; other times that would mean just reporting the items off the agenda with no action.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of 2013, the Council\u2019s five committees had a combined 21 items pending, ranging from the issuance of outdoor noise permits to a plan to bring Google\u2019s Street View Trekker program to Raleigh.<\/p>\n<p>In Raleigh&#8217;s council-manager system of government, the Council is responsible for legislating the city, voting on policies and ordinances that shape the way Raleigh is run and helping form the path it will take in the future.<\/p>\n<p>When issues come before the Council that require more analysis or community input, they are generally referred to one of five committees for further study.<\/p>\n<p>While there are no set rules for how long an item may remain in committee, Councilor Mary-Ann Baldwin, chair of the Law &amp; Public Safety Committee, said in election years such as 2013, the goal is generally to wrap up any pending items by years&#8217; end.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;One thing we try to do, after an election and before there&#8217;s a new council is to clean out of all our committee assignments,&#8221; Baldwin said.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"module align-right half type-aside\"><strong><center>Standing Items in Committee<\/center><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Budget and Economic Development: Chair Mayor Nancy McFarlane<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Item #09-42 &#8211; PROP\/Rental Registration \u2013 Updates (11\/15\/11)<br \/>\nItem #11-12 -Development Services Advisory Committee \u2013 Status Report (10\/2\/12)<br \/>\nItem #11-18 &#8211; Residential Recycling Program (11\/5\/13)<br \/>\nItem # 11-19 &#8211; Scattered Site Policy \u2013 Proposed Revision (11\/19\/13)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Comprehensive Planning Committee: Chair Russ Stephenson<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Item #11-04 &#8211; TC-9-11 \u2013 Outdoor Storage Yard \u2013 Height of Materials (2\/7\/12)<br \/>\nItem #11-10 &#8211; Unified Development Ordinance Topics (5\/1\/12) (Multimodal Transportation Capacity Incentives)<br \/>\nItem #11-12 &#8211;\u00a0Comprehensive Plan Amendments\/UDO (CP-2-12 Issues) (5\/1\/12)<br \/>\nItem #11-31 &#8211; Comprehensive Plan \u2013 Infrastructure Replacement Policy (5\/21\/13)<br \/>\nItem #11-36 &#8211; Z-11-12 \u2013 Strickland Road Development Plan (8\/6\/13)<br \/>\nItem #11-39 &#8211; Retrofitting Suburban Retail Centers (9\/3\/13)<br \/>\nItem #11-43 &#8211; Raleigh Historic Development Commission (10\/1\/13)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Law and Public Safety: Chair Mary-Ann Baldwin<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Item #11-12 &#8211; Sweepstake Parlors &#8211; Location Criteria (6\/19\/12)<br \/>\nItem #11-39 &#8211; Amplified Entertainment Permitting Process (11\/5\/13)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Public Works Committee: Chair Eugene Weeks<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Item #11-07 &#8211; Brentwood Today Lake and Dam Rehabilitation Project (4\/17\/12; 6\/15\/12; 9\/14\/12)<br \/>\nItem #11-33 &#8211; Chasteal Trails \u2013 Stormwater \u2013 Various Issues (10\/15\/13)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Technology and Communications Committee: Chair Bonner Gaylord<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Item #11-12 &#8211; Budget Web Visual Tools &#8211; Cost Analysis (1\/2\/13)<br \/>\nItem #11-16 &#8211; Shop Local Raleigh Study (3\/19\/13)<br \/>\nItem #11-17 &#8211;\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.walkscore.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Walkscore.com<\/a>\u00a0App &#8211; Utilization (3\/19\/13)<br \/>\nItem #11-19 &#8211; Gig.U Status Report (5\/7\/13) Note: GigU is now known as NC Next Generation Network<br \/>\nItem #11-20 &#8211; Google Street View Trekker Project (7\/6\/13)<br \/>\nItem #11-21 &#8211; Solarize Raleigh Program &#8211; Advertising (11\/1913)<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Planning for New Transit Options<\/strong><br \/>\nAt six each, the Comprehensive Planning Committee was tied with the Technology &amp; Communications Committee for most items pending.<\/p>\n<p>Many of the items in the Comprehensive Planning Committee, chaired by Councilor Russ Stephenson, were tied to the city\u2019s 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the new <a href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/tag\/udo\/\" target=\"_blank\">Unified Development Ordinance<\/a>, which is an entire new zoning code and codifies many of the plan\u2019s guidelines.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI had a request from the planning staff,\u201d Stephenson said. \u201cThey were kind of under the gun with all the UDO implementation, and they asked, &#8216;Can you give us a break on some of the big-picture, less time-sensitive issues?&#8217; That\u2019s why they\u2019re still sitting there.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>These long-range items mostly revolve around the city\u2019s goal to create more urbanized, walkable neighborhoods with a focus on alternative methods of transportation, such as walking, bicycling and public transit.<\/p>\n<p>Item 11-12, initially referred to the committee in May of 2012, deals largely with the future of suburban mixed-use developments, which Stephenson said were mostly designed around car access.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ve got these suburban shopping centers that may not be as successful as they wished to be,\u201d Stephenson said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe opportunity is if we\u2019re going to be growing, we can make it easier for people to get there, more desirable for people to get there by walking or biking,\u201d he said. \u201cThat\u2019s a longer-term conversation, nothing is going to happen overnight.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Item 11-10, also referred to the committee in May 2012, deals with a similar issue, namely, how to incentivize future developments to increase the capacity for multimodal transportation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have a new element in the UDO that\u2019s called infrastructure sufficiency,\u201d Stephenson said.<\/p>\n<p>The element ties new development to infrastructure capacity.<\/p>\n<p>For many years, the chief way in which new developments dealt with transportation issues was by having developers add new lanes to the surrounding roads.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf that\u2019s the only way that a person can incentivize their project,\u201d Stephenson said, \u201cthat\u2019s really working against the larger picture of things being more multimodal.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Planning for New Technologies<\/strong><br \/>\nMany of the items pending in the Technology and Communications committee, chaired by Bonner Gaylord, share a similar lack of urgency. They include plans for a new way of visualizing budget data on the city\u2019s web site, making it easier for taxpayers to understand where their money is going, and a goal to bring Google\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/maps\/about\/behind-the-scenes\/streetview\/treks\/\" target=\"_blank\">Street View Trek Project<\/a> to Raleigh.<\/p>\n<p>The Trek project uses the same camera technology as Google\u2019s Street View project, which allows anyone with an Internet connection to take a virtual tour of a countless array of the world\u2019s roads. Using a specially adapted backpack, the Trekker project would allow the city to map everything from its <a href=\"http:\/\/www.raleighnc.gov\/arts\/content\/PRecDesignDevelop\/Articles\/CapitalAreaGreenwayTrailSystem.html\" target=\"_blank\">greenways<\/a> to the downtown Convention Center.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf we got it to come to Raleigh, we could have someone walk through the Convention Center, so when an attendee comes to Raleigh, they could find the exact room they need to walk to,\u201d Gaylord said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe could do the same thing for the Duke Center for the Performing Arts. People could see what the inside of the facility looks like, what it feels like to be on stage,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>One of the items on the committee\u2019s agenda, 11-21, which deals with the Solarize Raleigh cost-share program, stirred up some controversy at the Jan. 7 City Council meeting, when several members of the local solar business community expressed concerns about whether the program would provide any real benefits.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI was really excited about it,\u201d Gaylord said. \u201cBut given concerns addressed the other night, I want to do some more digging.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Most of the items on the committee\u2019s agenda, Gaylord said, were deferred in part because he wanted to allow the new city manager, Ruffin Hall, time to familiarize himself with them.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cObviously, Ruffin has a lot of things he\u2019s acclimating himself to, and I want to be respectful of his workload; there\u2019s nothing on there that\u2019s really urgent,\u201d Gaylord said.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Managing Existing Issues<\/strong><br \/>\nThe Law &amp; Public Safety and Public Works committees both deal with more pressing, current issues; each had only two items carry into 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Item 11-12, which deals with <a title=\"On Sweepstakes Parlors, City Plays the Waiting Game\" href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2013\/05\/15\/on-sweepstakes-parlors-city-plays-the-waiting-game\/\" target=\"_blank\">Sweepstakes Parlors<\/a>, has been in the Law &amp; Public safety committee since June 2012. Because of the numerous legal complications stemming from the parlors, Baldwin said it was not an issue that could be rushed or easily laid to rest.<\/p>\n<p>The parlors are \u201cnot something you want to see popping up all over the city,\u201d said Baldwin, adding that city is trying to determine \u201cwhat we can do legally with current statutes; there are things going on statewide that will impact our ability to get things done.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>An update on the matter is expected from the city attorney at their next meeting, she said.<\/p>\n<p>The other item, 11-39, which deals with <a title=\"One Agreement on Noise Permits: Process Doesn\u2019t Work\" href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2013\/11\/13\/one-agreement-on-noise-permits-process-doesnt-work\/\" target=\"_blank\">outdoor noise permits<\/a>, was referred to the committee in November 2013. Baldwin said the various stakeholders \u2014 neighbors, businesses and the Raleigh Police Department \u2014 were given three months to come up with recommendations, and will be presenting at the committee\u2019s February meeting.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat was happening,\u201d Baldiwn said, \u201cis we were doing these amplified noise permits, and it really was pitting neighbors against businesses; what we wanted to do was see if there was a more cooperative approach we could take.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Both items in the Public Works Committee, chaired by Eugene Weeks, deal with case-specific issues.<\/p>\n<p>11-07, dealing with the <a title=\"Brentwood Today Lake Decision Delayed, Again\" href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2013\/11\/27\/brentwood-today-lake-decision-delayed-again\/\" target=\"_blank\">Brentwood Today Lake<\/a> and Dam Rehabilitation, has been in committee since April 2012 and was referred back twice again in June and September of that year.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-12374\" alt=\"brentwood lake\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/brentwood-lake-336x247.jpg\" width=\"336\" height=\"247\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/brentwood-lake-336x247.jpg 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/brentwood-lake-771x568.jpg 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/brentwood-lake-1170x863.jpg 1170w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/07\/brentwood-lake.jpg 1182w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s held up because there\u2019s some things where the city is talking to the people out there, and there\u2019s a difference in opinion on what should be done what should not be done,\u201d Weeks said.<\/p>\n<p>Item 11-33, which pertains to the stormwater installation in the Chasteal Trails development, has only been in the committee since October 2013.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere were\u00a0two different types of engineering reports there, and conflicting information,\u201d Weeks said.<\/p>\n<p>After the initial installation, the job was certified by an engineer, but failed to pass a city inspection. Weeks said the issue will be addressed at the next meeting.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Adjusting City Policies<\/strong><br \/>\nThe Budget and Economic Development Committee, chaired by Mayor Nancy McFarlane, saw four items still pending at the start of this year.<\/p>\n<p>Items 9-42 and 11-18 have been in committee the longest; November 2011 and October 2012, respectively. The former deals with the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.raleighnc.gov\/business\/content\/PlanDev\/Articles\/Inspections\/ProbationaryRentalOccu.html\" target=\"_blank\">Probationary Rental Occupancy Permits<\/a>, the implementation of which the city has had to adjust since a new state statute passed in 2011.<\/p>\n<p>The latter is a status report on the Development Services Advisory Committee, which advises city staff on ways to improve the development process within the city.<\/p>\n<p>The other two, more recent items, 11-18 and 11-19, were referred to the committee in November of 2013 and deal with increasing the city\u2019s recycling rate and revising the city\u2019s <a title=\"Affordable Housing Policy Under Review\" href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/city-council\/2013\/11\/21\/affordable-housing-policy-under-review\/\" target=\"_blank\">scattered site policy<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_20052\"  class=\"wp-caption module image center\" style=\"max-width: 600px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-20052\" alt=\"This color-coded map ranks areas of the city based on how much affordable housing is in the area.\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/scatter_site_policy.jpg\" width=\"600\" height=\"482\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\"> <\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">This color-coded map ranks areas of the city based on how much affordable housing is in the area.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Although McFarlane did not return calls seeking comment for this article, the scattered site policy was deferred so that Councilor Thomas Crowder could offer more input.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2014 and Beyond<\/strong><br \/>\nWhile some items are held up in committee for extended periods of time, Councilors say they make every effort to address the most pressing and urgent issues in as timely a matter as possible. The most cited reason for delay was simply the need for further analysis and a desire to not overwhelm city employees with more work than they have time for.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI just want to be respectful of staff\u2019s ability to get these things done,\u201d Gaylord said. \u201cA lot of these projects are sort of long-term implementations, and updates come as staff is able to work through them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Weeks said the committees are a good way to ensure that best practices are followed and that every issue gets the appropriate amount of attention.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen [an item] goes to committee, a note is put out so concerned citizens will be able to come and appear before us,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019ll hear the staff report on the issue, and then listen to the public and we\u2019ll go from there. Then we decide if we want to report it out to City Council, and they will vet it and vote on it.\u201d Weeks said. \u201cWe have the authority to take it back, if the City Council might not agree with it. We had that happen a couple of times.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This year starts with more than 20 items pending before the Council\u2019s five committees. The Record set out to figure out what those items were and why they are still in committee.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24061,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,15],"tags":[754],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20888"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24061"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20888"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20888\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}