{"id":21096,"date":"2014-02-25T16:25:54","date_gmt":"2014-02-25T21:25:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=21096"},"modified":"2014-02-25T16:25:54","modified_gmt":"2014-02-25T21:25:54","slug":"six-upper-neuse-streams-added-to-polluted-list","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/environment-news\/2014\/02\/25\/six-upper-neuse-streams-added-to-polluted-list\/","title":{"rendered":"Six Upper Neuse Streams Added to Polluted List"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Six rivers in the Upper Neuse river basin are slated to join the state\u2019s list of polluted streams, due to the <a href=\"http:\/\/epa.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\">Environmental Protection Agency<\/a> April 1. The list, known as the <a href=\"http:\/\/portal.ncdenr.org\/web\/wq\/ps\/mtu\/assessment\" target=\"_blank\">303d list<\/a>, includes all streams that have failed water quality standards and do not yet have a cleanup plan.<\/p>\n<p>This map shows streams with problems in red. The lightest blue streams have not been tested by the state. <em>Click for larger view.<\/em><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-21097\" alt=\"WaterQual\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/WaterQual-771x771.png\" width=\"771\" height=\"771\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/WaterQual-771x771.png 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/WaterQual-140x140.png 140w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/WaterQual-336x336.png 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/WaterQual-60x60.png 60w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/WaterQual-1170x1170.png 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The state has sampled fewer than one-third of the nearly 13,000 streams in North Carolina, according to Cam McNutt, environmental technician with the state <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncdenr.gov\/web\/guest\" target=\"_blank\">Department of Environment and Natural Resources<\/a>. The EPA does not require a complete inventory.<\/p>\n<p>DENR, he said, is focused on streams with point source discharges, such as wastewater treatment plant, and streams where they have access. County and city governments may test streams within their jurisdiction, as Raleigh does.<\/p>\n<p>Every stream monitored under Raleigh\u2019s volunteer monitoring program has tested positive for water quality problems, including bacteria potentially from human, pet, and wildlife feces or leaky sewer pipes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Urban Streams<\/strong><br \/>\nUrban streams across the nation fail water quality assessments.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cStreams draining downtown Raleigh are probably not in very good shape and probably haven\u2019t been since the city was built,\u201d McNutt said.<\/p>\n<p>The state doesn\u2019t use Raleigh\u2019s data because it does not meet the state\u2019s gathering and testing requirements.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_20916\"  class=\"wp-caption module image center\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-20916\" alt=\"pigeon house creek\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/pigeonhouse-771x513.jpg\" width=\"771\" height=\"513\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/pigeonhouse-771x513.jpg 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/pigeonhouse-336x223.jpg 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/pigeonhouse.jpg 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Charles Duncan \/ Raleigh Public Record<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Pigeon House Creek<\/p><\/div>\n<p>However, according to the city\u2019s website, the data enables Raleigh to respond when a problem is detected such as high bacteria levels, which could indicate a sewer leak.<\/p>\n<p>Upper Neuse Riverkeeper Mathew Starr said there have been some successes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn pictures from 10 years ago [Rocky Branch Creek] looked terrible. It was degraded. The state has done, and City of Raleigh, some excellent work,\u201d he said. \u201cIt is a good example of how we can improve our urban waterways.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>While Wake County tests local beaches and drinking water wells, testing does not include its streams. Melinda Clark, stormwater programs manager for Wake County, said, \u201cIt is a state responsibility. It is a huge effort.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Next Steps<\/strong><br \/>\nGovernments and nonprofits use the 303d list to prioritize streams for protection and restoration.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOne thing that is looked at in prioritizing stream corridors is level of impairment,\u201d Clark said. \u201cAnd we can use it to protect high-quality water sources.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rivers are removed from the list if the problem is resolved or if a plan to fix the problem is implemented.<\/p>\n<p>Plans may target a pollutant, such as nitrogen, for reduction. That type of plan is called a total maximum daily load, but may take years to fix water quality issues.<\/p>\n<p>Streams with aquatic life problems, McNutt said, may \u201clack good habitat and experience hydrological overload\u2014very heavy storm loads that scour the stream and remove habitat.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rain-related problems are reduced by preventing the rapid increase in water volume\u2014reducing the amount of covered land so soil can absorb rain water or harvesting rainwater in barrels and cisterns.<\/p>\n<p>This year, six rivers in the upper Neuse River Basin were added for aquatic life, dissolved oxygen, or fish community problems.<\/p>\n<p>Public comments on the 303d list are being accepted through March 14.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"module align-left half type-aside\">\n<aside class=\"module align-center full type-aside\"><strong>Resources<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/portal.ncdenr.org\/web\/lr\/sw-impaired-waters-map\" target=\"_blank\">DENR&#8217;s Statewide Map of Impaired Waters<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/portal.ncdenr.org\/web\/wq\/ps\/mtu\/assessment\" target=\"_blank\">Learn more about the 303d list<\/a>.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/portal.ncdenr.org\/c\/document_library\/get_file?uuid=39a9dfb4-8be3-4674-badb-c3b7c7d7cb97&amp;groupId=38364\" target=\"_blank\">Instructions for comment on the 303d list<\/a>.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/water.epa.gov\/scitech\/datait\/tools\/warsss\/glossary.cfm\" target=\"_blank\">EPA Glossary<\/a><\/aside>\n<\/aside>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The state 303d list, due biennially to EPA, lists many rivers in the Raleigh area. See if your local stream is on it. In a separate program, every stream in Raleigh has water quality problems.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24048,"featured_media":21097,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[48],"tags":[1571,536,859,348,1572],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21096"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24048"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21096"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21096\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21097"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}