{"id":21250,"date":"2014-04-02T11:58:44","date_gmt":"2014-04-02T15:58:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=21250"},"modified":"2014-04-03T11:43:05","modified_gmt":"2014-04-03T15:43:05","slug":"task-force-to-review-sign-ordinance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/city-council\/2014\/04\/02\/task-force-to-review-sign-ordinance\/","title":{"rendered":"Task Force to Review Sign Ordinance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If approved, the new law would extend city rules about signs to include those posted on the inside of windows, not just the exterior, forcing many owners to change window signs to conform. <\/p>\n<p>A November staff analysis of Glenwood South showed that 51 of 75 properties had window signs. <\/p>\n<p>During Tuesday&#8217;s City Council meeting, three business owners spoke against the proposed changes, which are undergoing review by the Planning Commission. <\/p>\n<p>Representing Shop Local Raleigh, Jennifer Martin asked that Councilors review the sign ordinance in its entirety and update it to reflect the changes that have occurred in the city since the original ordinance was put into place more than two decades ago. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cNinety percent of our members complete review of sign ordinance,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n<p>Developer John Kane \u2014 known for the North Hills development \u2014 said the current sign ordinance is not only onerous for small businesses, but national retailers also find it difficult to comply. <\/p>\n<p>Retailers, he said, are allowed to use only four colors, which, \u201cmakes everything very homogenous.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe don\u2019t want to be Cary,\u201d said Louie Bowen, owner of a costume shop on Glenwood Avenue, poking fun at Cary\u2019s strict sign restrictions.  \u201cWe want to be Raleigh.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Following the comments, Councilors decided to form a task force to review the current proposal, but leave the comprehensive sign discussion for a later time. <\/p>\n<p>Councilors asked that city staff come back in two weeks with member recommendations for the new task force. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m not fully aware that we have all our bases covered,\u201d said Councilor Mary-Ann Baldwin. <\/p>\n<p>The task force and Planning Commission will then have 45 days to review the proposed law changes, meet with residents and business owners and come back to Council with a recommendation. The task force and Commission will also bring back any other issues that were brought to light during the process. <\/p>\n<p>City staff will report back to Council with the task force member list at its next meeting April 15. <\/p>\n<div id=\"DV-viewer-1100736-raleigh-sign-ordinance\" class=\"DV-container\"><\/div>\n<p><script src=\"\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/s3.documentcloud.org\/viewer\/loader.js\"><\/script><br \/>\n<script>\n  DV.load(\"\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/1100736-raleigh-sign-ordinance.js\", {\n  width: 600,\n    height: 400,\n    sidebar: false,\n    text: false,\n    pdf: false,\n    container: \"#DV-viewer-1100736-raleigh-sign-ordinance\"\n  });\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>City Councilors are putting together a task force to review the city\u2019s proposed sign ordinance and revisit other signage issues that have come to light during public discussions. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24029,"featured_media":20644,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,15],"tags":[1604],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21250"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24029"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21250\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}