{"id":21653,"date":"2014-06-09T14:55:20","date_gmt":"2014-06-09T18:55:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=21653"},"modified":"2014-06-09T14:55:20","modified_gmt":"2014-06-09T18:55:20","slug":"raleigh-councilors-lean-toward-91-7m-parks-bond","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/city-council\/2014\/06\/09\/raleigh-councilors-lean-toward-91-7m-parks-bond\/","title":{"rendered":"Raleigh Councilors Lean Toward $91.7M Parks Bond"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While the amount hasn\u2019t been finalized, Raleigh City Councilors are leaning toward a $91.7 million parks bond for the November ballot. <\/p>\n<p>During Tuesday\u2019s regular meeting, Councilors were presented three options of varying costs, with the lowest being $58.8 million, the next $74.7 million and a fully funded scenario at $91.7 million. Councilors will finalize the bond amount at their next meeting June 17. <\/p>\n<p>Councilor Bonner Gaylord asked that staff also bring with them more information about Falls Whitew Water Park and how that could fit into the plan. <\/p>\n<p>All of the current scenarios (see three below) focus on funding deferred maintenance and making long-needed improvements. <\/p>\n<p>None of the options include funding for Dix Park. <\/p>\n<p>Improvements for Moore Square were originally considered as part of the potential project list, but were pulled when Councilors decided to use general obligation bonds for funding. <\/p>\n<p>The most expensive scenario would require about $1.4 million in annual operating costs for a total tax increase of 1.72 cents.<br \/>\n<strong><br \/>\nSupport for White Water Park<\/strong><br \/>\nA public hearing for the bond will likely be scheduled in mid-July, but supporters of the water park came out during last week&#8217;s budget public hearing. <\/p>\n<p>Organizer and WRAL meteorologist Elizabeth Gardner said she was happy to see that the park was included in the parks department&#8217;s system plan, but was disappointed that it was not included in the final cut of proposed bond projects. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe&#8217;re here to say that it&#8217;s important to us. We think this is going to be a great thing for Raleigh,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n<p>Kayaking enthusiasts weren&#8217;t the only supporters of the project. <\/p>\n<p>Durham resident and professional firefighter Nathan Taylor is a member of one of two of the state&#8217;s urban search and rescue teams.<br \/>\n\u201cWhat we don&#8217;t have, what we&#8217;ve never had, is a venue for swift water rescue training,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n<p>Taylor said regular training drills could be done at the park, eliminating the need to travel to Charlotte. <\/p>\n<p>Staff will bring back more information about the possible funding of the park at the Councilors&#8217; regular meeting next week. <\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-3-771x522.png\" alt=\"Parks Bond Scenario 3\" width=\"771\" height=\"522\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-21654\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-3-771x522.png 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-3-336x227.png 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-3.png 958w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-2-771x514.png\" alt=\"Parks Bond Scenario 2\" width=\"771\" height=\"514\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-21655\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-2-771x514.png 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-2-336x224.png 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-2.png 967w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-1-771x506.png\" alt=\"Parks Bond Scenario 1\" width=\"771\" height=\"506\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-21656\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-1-771x506.png 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-1-336x220.png 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/Parks-Bond-Scenario-1.png 966w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Councilors are considering a $91.7 million parks bond for the November ballot. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24029,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,15],"tags":[1683,1684],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21653"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24029"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21653\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}