{"id":21707,"date":"2014-06-20T14:27:38","date_gmt":"2014-06-20T18:27:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=21707"},"modified":"2014-06-20T13:26:10","modified_gmt":"2014-06-20T17:26:10","slug":"development-beat-new-zoning-code-new-challenges","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2014\/06\/20\/development-beat-new-zoning-code-new-challenges\/","title":{"rendered":"Development Beat: New Zoning Code, New Challenges"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The UDO&#8217;s oft-derided  lack of specificity in the text is by design, according to some city staff. <\/p>\n<p>Following a series of complaints leveled against the Unified Development Ordinance, city staff were given the opportunity at last week\u2019s Comprehensive Planning Committee to respond to a some of the issues raised. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s written in such a way to allow City Council and the Planning Commission to use independent judgment,\u201d when considering various rezoning and land-use cases, said Travis Crane, the city\u2019s Planning and Zoning administrator.<div id=\"attachment_20894\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignright\" style=\"max-width: 336px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/rezoning_map_UDO-336x214.png\" alt=\"A map showing the areas that will be changed for the UDO, with legacy districts shown in pink.\" width=\"336\" height=\"214\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-20894\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/rezoning_map_UDO-336x214.png 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/rezoning_map_UDO-771x492.png 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/rezoning_map_UDO.png 1130w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Image provided by City of Raleigh <\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">A map showing the areas that will be changed for the UDO, with legacy districts shown in pink.<\/p><\/div><\/p>\n<p>Much of the discussion was focused on the land-use category Neighborhood Mixed Use, and whether it should allow for the construction of a Publix in north Raleigh on Falls of Neuse.<\/p>\n<p>The NMU designation is intended for developments that service a one-mile radius area that would allow for drug stores, dry cleaners and supermarkets. Opponents of the Publix development argued that the store, by industry definition, would not be classed as a supermarket, but rather as a super-store, which is defined by the Food Marketing Institute as any grocery store larger than 30,000 square feet.<\/p>\n<p>The Publix is currently planned to come in at about 50,000 square feet, which neighbors argue would draw in significant vehicle traffic, going against the NMU\u2019s goal of creating pedestrian-oriented districts.<\/p>\n<p>At a time when a large swath of southeast Raleigh residents are living in a federally recognized danger zone known as a\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2013\/02\/01\/national-grocers-may-not-solve-the-east-raleigh-food-desert\/\" target=\"_blank\">food desert<\/a>\u00a0due to a lack of grocery stores, it may seem strange to complain about an overabundance of supermarkets. However, as with the protests against a certain Hillsborough Street <a href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2014\/06\/07\/udo-complaints-and-development-by-the-numbers\/\" target=\"_blank\">development<\/a>, the underlying issue is not so much about any one individual project, but rather the overall direction new development will take under the UDO.<\/p>\n<p>Councilor Bonner Gaylord acknowledged that the city will likely experience some \u201cgrowing pains\u201d over the coming months and said he views the recent wave of complaints as a good sign for the city as a whole.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is reflective of something positive,\u201d Gaylord said. \u201cPeople want to invest in their community, and people want to protect their investment in the community.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Happening Now-Ish\u00a0<\/strong><br \/>\nDowntowners looking to see a man about a dog will soon have a new option in the form of Tasty 8\u2019s Gourmet Hot Dogs, to be located in the Alexander Square development on Fayetteville Street. The $100,000 fit-out of the former home of Spize Caf\u00e9 will be handled by Angle Contractors, which also did the work for Glenwood South\u2019s Noir Bar &#038; Lounge. <\/p>\n<p>According to the Facebook page for Tasty 8\u2019s \u2013 so named because it will offer eight types each of hot dogs, beers, shakes and dipping sauces \u2013 the restaurant is scheduled to open on or about July 4. <\/p>\n<p>Hillsborough Street institution Edible Art Bakery &#038; Caf\u00e9 will soon be relocating from its downtown home to a new, midtown location at the North Hills shopping center. If everything stays on schedule, the bakery will be open in its new spot this fall.<\/p>\n<p>Creedmoor Medical Center will soon be welcoming a new addition to their roster in the form of Dr. Bain, as permits for the $378,760 fit-out of his office were issued last week. It is unknown at this time whether the good doctor merely adopted the medical profession or was born into it, molded by it. Completely unfounded rumors have the doctor repeatedly telling patients that he will show them where he has made his home while preparing to bring medical care. Then he will heal them.<\/p>\n<p><em>After writing this paragraph, I wrote the following note to my film-challenged editor: This is a reference to The Dark Knight Rises, the villain of which is named Bane. I ripped off a speech he made and put in slightly different words (heal instead of break, etc.) While not a very good movie, it was pretty successful so I\u2019m not sure if it needs explaining. <\/p>\n<p>Editor\u2019s response: I did see the movie\u2014it was not very good. And no, I didn\u2019t get the reference. We mean no disrespect to Dr. Bane, but apparently we have number of movie nerds in the audience.<\/p>\n<p>Correction: The preceding paragraph said Raleigh Public Record has \u201cmovie nerds\u201d in the audience. We, in fact, only have \u201cmovie buffs\u201d in the audience. The only \u201cmovie nerds\u201d are the ones on staff.<\/em><br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nNot to be outdone, the offices of Maxim Healthcare subsidiary Raleigh Home Health Accredited, located in the corporate center at 5510 Six Forks Road, is undergoing a $40,000 renovation of its own. As its corporate parent is in no way associated with the men\u2019s magazine of the same name, it\u2019s doubtful that patients will be exposed to a mix of dirty jokes and photos of scantily clad D-list celebrities as part of their treatment.<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\n<strong>Coming Soon (Or Not)<\/strong><br \/>\nCity Council this week held the long-awaited, final public hearing for zoning case Z-33-2013, which would allow for an AutoZone on what is currently a residential parcel at 4130 Western Boulevard. All the usual suspects were there. Attorney Thomas Worth, on behalf of the applicant; adjacent property owner and former City Council candidate Jerome Goldberg, on behalf of himself. After some brief discussion, the Council voted against allowing the case to move forward. <\/p>\n<p>The second case, <a href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2014\/03\/31\/development-beat-updates-from-meredith-colelge-to-lynn-road\/\" target=\"_blank\">Z-2-14<\/a>, a seven-story, 24-unit student apartment complex with ground-floor retail on Hillsborough Street across from NC State\u2019s DH Hill library, has also been the <a href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2014\/05\/01\/development-beat-on-hillsborough-street\/\" target=\"_blank\">source of much debate<\/a>. <\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_21480\"  class=\"wp-caption module image aligncenter\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/hborough2-771x578.jpg\" alt=\"Hillsborough Street 2\" width=\"771\" height=\"578\" class=\"size-large wp-image-21480\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/hborough2-771x578.jpg 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/hborough2-336x252.jpg 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/hborough2-1170x877.jpg 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">James Borden \/ Raleigh Public Record<\/p><\/div>\n<p>All of the Councilors had something to say \u2013 mostly that they were conflicted, largely due to the building exceeding the area\u2019s 5-story maximum. Councilors Baldwin, Gaylord, Odom, Weeks and Mairano all voted in favor of the project, saying it was hard to turn down the kind of density the development would offer in the transit corridor. <\/p>\n<p>Mayor McFarlane and councilors Crowder and Stephenson all voted against it, with Crowder arguing it would set a \u201cvery bad precedent,\u201d and McFarlane saying the same density benefits would be provided with five stories. Councilors need a two-thirds majority to pass an ordinance on first reading, so there will be another reading at the next meeting. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Raleigh Talks<\/strong><br \/>\nDistinguished by a disappointing lack of fist-fights, chair-throwing and chants of \u201cCharles! Charles! Charles!\u201d the Raleigh Public Record\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/editors-notebook\/2014\/06\/19\/first-raleightalks-a-success\/\" target=\"_blank\">first-ever Raleigh Talks event<\/a>, moderated by Record founder Charles Duncan, drew a significant crowd\u00a0Wednesday\u00a0to downtown\u2019s Tir Na Nog.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_21702\"  class=\"wp-caption module image aligncenter\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/talk6021-2-771x293.jpg\" alt=\"Editor Charles Duncan kicks off the first Raleigh Talks event Wednesday at Tir Na Nog. \" width=\"771\" height=\"293\" class=\"size-large wp-image-21702\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/talk6021-2-771x293.jpg 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/talk6021-2-336x127.jpg 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/talk6021-2.jpg 1120w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">Karen Tam \/ Raleigh Public Record<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Editor Charles Duncan kicks off the first Raleigh Talks event Wednesday at Tir Na Nog. <\/p><\/div>\n<p>Using the controversial \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/2014\/03\/11\/city-decision-stops-work-at-modernist-house-in-oakwood\/\" target=\"_blank\">Modern Oakwood<\/a>\u201d house as a jumping-off point, the panel discussion featured speakers offering perspectives on both sides of the issue, and explored a variety of subjects related to new infill development in historic neighborhoods.<\/p>\n<p>Although the house in question complained via\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ModernOakwood\" target=\"_blank\">Twitter<\/a>\u00a0about its lack of an invite to speak on the panel, those that spoke in favor of its construction, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.presnc.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Preservation North Carolina<\/a>\u2019s Myrick Howard, made a number of compelling arguments as to why historic neighborhoods should allow for the type of development that many see as non-conforming. These new homes, it was argued, add and contribute to the character of said neighborhoods, rather than take away from them.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_21710\"  class=\"wp-caption module image aligncenter\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/oakwood1-2-771x513.jpg\" alt=\"oakwood1-2\" width=\"771\" height=\"513\" class=\"size-large wp-image-21710\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/oakwood1-2-771x513.jpg 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/oakwood1-2-336x223.jpg 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/oakwood1-2-1170x779.jpg 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">James Borden \/ Raleigh Public Record<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Those on the other side of the issue, such as Mary Iverson, president of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.midtownraleighnews.com\/2014\/05\/13\/3858266\/new-nonprofit-formed-in-oakwood.html\" target=\"_blank\">Oak City Preservation Alliance<\/a>, argued that state statutes regarding development in designated historic districts, which require adherence to certain architectural styles, supersede local regulations, which are less specific. Concerns were also raised that by allowing too much modern development, the neighborhood may lose its historical designation.<\/p>\n<p>While a number of the panelists engaged in an effective method of non-verbal communication known as \u201crolling your eyes,\u201d the discussion remained mostly civil, free of kind of the rhetoric found in most discussions about the house.  Which, by the way, is much bigger in person than it looks in pictures. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Implementation of the new Unified Development Ordinance is still proving controversial as Raleigh City Council and Planning Commission members review some of the first development applications under the new zoning code.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24061,"featured_media":21480,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1599,15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21707"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24061"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21707"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21707\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}