{"id":22520,"date":"2015-01-16T06:33:27","date_gmt":"2015-01-16T11:33:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=22520"},"modified":"2015-01-16T06:42:45","modified_gmt":"2015-01-16T11:42:45","slug":"law-and-public-safety-discusses-hillsborough-business-improvement-district","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/city-council\/2015\/01\/16\/law-and-public-safety-discusses-hillsborough-business-improvement-district\/","title":{"rendered":"Law and Public Safety Discusses Business Improvement Districts"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Law and Public Safety committee met Tuesday to discuss the expansion policy of the Municipal Service District.<\/p>\n

Before the meeting, questions had been raised about expansion of the MSD and exclusions<\/a> to the MSD. At the meeting, staff outlined the language for the benefit of the members of the public who were present.<\/p>\n

\"Hillsborough<\/a>

Payton Chung<\/p>

Hillsborough Street<\/p><\/div>\n

Regarding expansions, requests may be initiated by the board of directors of the MSDs and later approved by City Council. The policy calls for no \u201cdonut holes\u201d in the MSD map and an expansion task force, which will be composed of residential and commercial owners.<\/p>\n

Exemptions must come from a resolution by City Council and a public hearing must be held to take into account the opinions of the neighborhood in which the exemption will take place. Even if a property is exempted from the MSD, they must stay within the MSD until the end of that fiscal year. All parties in an MSD must be assessed the MSD tax. Single-family residences will not be excluded.<\/p>\n

Seven members from the public spoke at the meeting regarding this issue and comments were wide-ranging.<\/p>\n

One said he liked the creation of a task force and the development of the proposed guidelines. Another said there should be a larger emphasis on \u2018need\u2019 for inclusion into the MSD and that the notifications regarding the possible inclusion into the MSD should be explicit. Others asked why their block on the street was included while others nearby were excluded.<\/p>\n

\"Hillsborough<\/a>

City of Raleigh<\/p>

Hillsborough Street Business Improvement District<\/p><\/div>\n

When the item was brought back to the table, councilors and city staff had a lengthy discussion about the issues the public had raised. Councilor Baldwin noted they were dealing with two things \u2014 the policy itself and the expansion \u2014 and she wanted input from the Hillsborough Street Community Service Corporation about why certain areas were included.<\/p>\n

David Diaz of the Downtown Raleigh Alliance said\u00a0these districts were created to help revitalize the district and that that revitalization created a need for supplemental services provided by these districts.<\/p>\n

City staff explained\u00a0that the definition of \u2018need\u2019 should include the maintenance of revitalized property, and that the expansion was implemented to maintain the same quality of experience on Hillsborough Street when traveling to downtown and Cameron Village.<\/p>\n

Councilor Odom said he thought these districts were now about taxes more than anything else.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt makes me rethink our BID process and what we\u2019re doing here if we\u2019re going into single-family homes,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

Both councilors Baldwin and Maiorano wanted additional information from staff regarding issues that the public had raised. Councilor Baldwin requested a map of the expansion areas complete with property types and boundary lines. Councilor Maiorano requested some\u00a0information on best practices by other cities who had implemented these districts.<\/p>\n

In order for staff to gain that information, councilor Baldwin said the item should be held at the table until February 24. Councilors Maiorano and Odom agreed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Law and Public Safety committee discussed possible exclusions and additions to the city’s business improvement districts. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1503513,"featured_media":18200,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22520"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1503513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22520\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18200"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}