{"id":3879,"date":"2010-03-02T19:04:36","date_gmt":"2010-03-03T00:04:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=3879"},"modified":"2010-03-03T09:12:12","modified_gmt":"2010-03-03T14:12:12","slug":"lightner-center-rejected-in-4-4-vote","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/city-council\/2010\/03\/02\/lightner-center-rejected-in-4-4-vote\/","title":{"rendered":"Lightner Center rejected in 4-4 vote"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The proposed public safety center finally got to a vote Tuesday after months of debate. The Raleigh City Council voted against moving ahead with the $205-million project in a 4-4 vote.<\/p>\n<p>Until council can reach a majority on the issue, spending on the project will come to a halt at a time when the council acknowledges a prime lending atmosphere. <\/p>\n<p>Mayor Charles Meeker, Mary-Ann Baldwin (at-large), James West (District C) and Nancy McFarlane (District A) all voted in favor of the Lightner Center, with Russ Stephenson (at-large), Bonner Gaylord (District E), Thomas Crowder (District D) and John Odom (District B) voting against.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It is time to move forward on this,&#8221; said Mayor Charles Meeker, who pushed for the vote.<\/p>\n<p>At the last two council sessions Stephenson, Gaylord and Crowder outlined a new plan that would involve splitting up the safety center in different locations as opposed to the current, centralized location on Raleigh&#8217;s historic Nash Square. Council will have to reach a majority on either plan to move forward.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If you had concerns, you should have brought them up years ago,&#8221; said Baldwin.<\/p>\n<p>The Lightner Center as proposed would require less than a half percent tax increase in 2011, Meeker said during the debate Tuesday. <\/p>\n<p>Stephenson asked city staff to determine how much could be borrowed without the increase.<\/p>\n<p>Gaylord said council needs to &#8220;determine how much we can spend, and then go fund those priorities.&#8221; Earlier, he had made a point that the city was over-prioritizing the center and ignoring other projects.<\/p>\n<p>During the discussion, Stephenson motioned for council to &#8220;borrow the money now, put it in the bank and accrue interest,&#8221; but was quickly withdrawn.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If we&#8217;re not going to do this comprehensively, I think we need to take a step back,&#8221; said James West, calling the motion &#8220;reactionary.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The safety of the center, which includes a publicly accessible area on the first floor, has been at the forefront of the debate. City Manager Russel Allen used other cities as pro-Lightner examples, noting other high-rise style safety centers, including one being constructed in New York City. <\/p>\n<p>Stephenson said he had also researched other cities and specifically said that New York was &#8220;decentralizing&#8221; its emergency centers since the September 11 terrorist attack. <\/p>\n<p>Currently, police and fire operations are scattered in temporary locations around the city. &#8220;Our police are in a building that was built to house city hall,&#8221; McFarlane said. James West called the center &#8220;a vote of confidence to our public safety department.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The proposed public safety center finally got to a vote Tuesday after months of debate. The Raleigh City Council voted against moving ahead with the $205-million project in a 4-4 vote.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,15,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3879"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3879"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3879\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}