{"id":49467,"date":"2015-12-03T06:00:37","date_gmt":"2015-12-03T11:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=49467"},"modified":"2015-12-07T06:34:32","modified_gmt":"2015-12-07T11:34:32","slug":"schematic-design-approved-for-moore-square","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/city-council\/2015\/12\/03\/schematic-design-approved-for-moore-square\/","title":{"rendered":"Schematic Design Approved for Moore Square"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>City Council met Tuesday after swearing in three new councilors the previous night to discuss a number of zoning and development related issues.<\/p>\n<p>A presentation was given on the schematic design of Moore Square.\u00a0It\u00a0concerned the 15 percent schematic design, which had been presented to local residents. A member of Sasaki, the design team, made the presentation to councilors.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_49478\"  class=\"wp-caption module image aligncenter\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-49478\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.05.04-AM-771x440.png\" alt=\"Current plans for the redevelopment of Moore Square\" width=\"771\" height=\"440\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.05.04-AM-771x440.png 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.05.04-AM-336x192.png 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.05.04-AM-1170x667.png 1170w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.05.04-AM.png 1305w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Current plans for the redevelopment of Moore Square<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The history of the square was said to be an important part of the design process. Trees were looked at as critical for the plan. The site would be imbued with the South Park Heritage Walk. A flexible lawn would allow for a variety of events. Community feedback stated that residents wanted to see Moore Square as a place for smaller, everyday events rather than just big events.<\/p>\n<p>The presentation focused on the architecture that would be built during the remaking of the park. Community residents said they would prefer an indoor-outdoor component on a human scale, to allow for interactivity within the park. Sasaki said that the architecture would be a hub point for the park, located in the southeast portion.<\/p>\n<p>Councilor Stephenson raised the question of the upkeep required for a number of years. Staff said that with every new park comes an operational analysis that allowed for how much the upkeep would cost and how it would affect the budget down the road.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_49480\"  class=\"wp-caption module image aligncenter\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-49480\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.04.09-AM-771x437.png\" alt=\"A rendering of Moore Square\" width=\"771\" height=\"437\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.04.09-AM-771x437.png 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.04.09-AM-336x190.png 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.04.09-AM-1170x663.png 1170w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/Screen-Shot-2015-12-03-at-2.04.09-AM.png 1343w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">A rendering of Moore Square<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A pair of rezoning cases, Z-34-15 and Z-35-15, were referred to the comprehensive planning committee.<\/p>\n<p>They concerned adjacent properties that are currently zoned residential-4. The proposed rezoning would be to residential-10-conditional use. Both cases were found to be inconsistent with the future land use map and comprehensive plan. The planning commission recommended approval by a 6-1 vote and the Midtown Citizens Advisory Council also recommended approval.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_22958\"  class=\"wp-caption module image aligncenter\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-22958\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/z3414-771x441.jpg\" alt=\"The are encircled in red is where Z-34 is proposed\" width=\"771\" height=\"441\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/z3414-771x441.jpg 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/z3414-336x192.jpg 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/z3414.jpg 835w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">City of Raleigh<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">The are encircled in red is where Z-34 is proposed<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The future land use map represented the two locations as low density residential, according to Bynum Walter in the planning department. She added that the expectation for more open space than the proposed development expected. Councilor Thompson advocated for a closer look at the two cases before making a decision.<\/p>\n<p>The Enterprise Land Management software implementation was approved by Council Tuesday. The item concerned the need for the city to have an overview of development information. This new software implementation would phase out old \u201clegacy\u201d systems and implement new software that would promote efficiency in the long run. Councilor Crowder asked about the cost of buying and maintaining the software. Staff said the upgrades were included in the ten-year cost not to exceed $9,716,857. The cost also covered a public portal.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_49481\"  class=\"wp-caption module image alignright\" style=\"max-width: 204px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\" wp-image-49481\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/butters-336x398.jpg\" alt=\"A very dangerous dog\" width=\"204\" height=\"242\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/butters-336x398.jpg 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/butters-771x914.jpg 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/butters-1170x1386.jpg 1170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 204px) 100vw, 204px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">A very dangerous dog<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In other business, revisions to the dangerous dog ordinance were referred to the city council session in January. The revisions clarified terms, such as \u201cdangerous dog,\u201d and defined terms such as \u201cprovocative\u201d and \u201cserious injury.\u201d The appeal process, the city attorney said, would be streamlined, eliminating the dangerous dog committee that existed for such appeals. Councilors Stephenson and Crowder indicated seeing the revisions in a forum to allow for more questions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>City Councilors on Tuesday approved the schematic design plans for the Moore Square redevelopment, a necessary step in moving the project forward.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1503513,"featured_media":50448,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49467"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1503513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49467\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}