{"id":75597,"date":"2016-03-23T06:00:05","date_gmt":"2016-03-23T10:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/raleighpublicrecord.org\/?p=75597"},"modified":"2016-03-22T23:18:04","modified_gmt":"2016-03-23T03:18:04","slug":"city-proposes-new-economic-development-map","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/news\/city-council\/2016\/03\/23\/city-proposes-new-economic-development-map\/","title":{"rendered":"City Proposes New Economic Development Map"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As part of the planning process for Raleigh&#8217;s 2030 Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 2009, the City developed a map intended to highlight areas that &#8220;demonstrated a need for economic development intervention.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Seven years later, that map is getting an upgrade.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;One issue with the map,&#8221; said Raleigh Planning Director Ken Bowers, &#8220;Is that is has fuzzy boundaries.&#8221;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_75662\"  class=\"wp-caption module image aligncenter\" style=\"max-width: 674px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-75662\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/oldecondevmap.jpg\" alt=\"The original map from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan\" width=\"674\" height=\"682\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/oldecondevmap.jpg 674w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/oldecondevmap-336x340.jpg 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/oldecondevmap-60x60.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 674px) 100vw, 674px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">City of Raleigh<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">The original map from the 2030 Comprehensive Plan<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Bowers was presenting the new map alongside James Sauls at the first meeting of\u00a0the Economic Development and Innovations Committee\u00a0on\u00a0Tuesday.\u00a0The committee is\u00a0overseen by Mayor Nancy McFarlane and Councilors Kay Crowder and \u00a0Bonner Gaylord. Sauls is the city&#8217;s Manager of Economic Development.<\/p>\n<p>When the initial map was drawn up, Bowers said, there were no incentive programs tied to the targeted areas, so boundary specificity\u00a0wasn&#8217;t an issue.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The desire to adopt geographic targets as part of the [economic development] tool kit moved us from a map with fuzzy to clear boundaries, &#8221; he explained.<\/p>\n<p>Bowers said they had also refined their method for determining which parts\u00a0of the city qualified. The two main factors were areas with high poverty rates and a lack of residential zoning, and areas with a lot of industrial zoning.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_75663\"  class=\"wp-caption module image aligncenter\" style=\"max-width: 771px;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-large wp-image-75663\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.10.57-PM-771x510.png\" alt=\"The newly proposed map will require Council approval\" width=\"771\" height=\"510\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.10.57-PM-771x510.png 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.10.57-PM-336x222.png 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.10.57-PM-768x508.png 768w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.10.57-PM.png 1095w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><p class=\"wp-media-credit\">City of Raleigh<\/p><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">The newly proposed map will require Council approval<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The new map\u00a0is being proposed as part of a\u00a0text change ordinance that&#8217;s currently under review\u00a0by the Planning Commission. If the ordinance is adopted by Council, it will clearly establish these new boundaries and allow businesses located within those economic development zones to qualify for larger grants from the City.<\/p>\n<p>After asking how the map tied into the City&#8217;s overall strategy for growth \u2014 it doesn&#8217;t, per Bowers \u2014 Councilor Crowder asked whether there was a major difference between planning for growth in a city and planning for economic development.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s not necessarily a need to provide incentive for growth,&#8221; Bowers explained.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Economic development typically focuses on areas perceived to be lagging and needing some public sector intervention.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>One specific example of public sector intervention is the City&#8217;s Facade Grant, first implemented in the 1980s. The program allows business and property owners downtown and within\u00a0certain pedestrian overlay districts to receive grants to\u00a0help them fund upgrades or improvements to their buildings&#8217; exteriors.<\/p>\n<p>Roberta Fox, an Assistant Director of design and planning for the City, asked Tuesday that the areas of eligibility for the Facade Grant be extended to include the newly established economic development zones throughout\u00a0Raleigh.<\/p>\n<p>More than 120 businesses have received a total of nearly $1 million since the program was implemented, Fox said. Developer and restaurateur Greg Hatem has been a frequent recipient of these grants, she added.<\/p>\n<p>Due to the limits on eligibility, however, Fox said they often have money left over \u2014 the program is allotted $50,000 annually \u2014 and have had to turn away businesses because they weren&#8217;t located within qualifying zones.<\/p>\n<p>Broadening the eligibility criteria would allow for more businesses to take advantage of the funds, Fox said, and allow\u00a0broader swathes of the city to benefit from its effects.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-75664\" src=\"http:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.16.15-PM-771x576.png\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2016-03-22 at 11.16.15 PM\" width=\"771\" height=\"576\" srcset=\"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.16.15-PM-771x576.png 771w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.16.15-PM-336x251.png 336w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.16.15-PM-768x573.png 768w, https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Screen-Shot-2016-03-22-at-11.16.15-PM.png 915w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 771px) 100vw, 771px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Fox said they were also considering increasing the scope of the grant to cover things like artwork and murals, which are not funded under the current program.<\/p>\n<p>The Economic Development and Innovation Committee voted unanimously to send both items to full Council.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Should a text change ordinance be adopted by City Council, a modified map highlighting areas in Raleigh in need of economic development will allow businesses within these zones to qualify for larger business investment grants from the City. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24061,"featured_media":75663,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75597"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24061"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75597\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/75663"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theraleighcommons.org\/raleighpublicrecord\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}